|
Post by nicholas on Dec 5, 2011 23:21:21 GMT -5
i think nicholas is just wording everything wrong. what he wants is for lagwagon to give him an mp3 of may 16 without vocals. he doesnt want to do with some shitty software, or have talented musicians on this board make it for him, he just wants the real deal studio version without vocals. im sure he doesnt actually mean he wants lagwagon to physically hand over the master copy of the song, because that would just be stupid of him to think it would be possible. maybe if he didnt name the thread 'lagwagon multi-tracks' and constantly mention the term multi tracks like some recording noob, we'd understand what he was talking about I don't know whether I should agree or be insulted. Lol.
|
|
|
Post by Mallrat on Dec 6, 2011 1:43:12 GMT -5
probably both. don't worry, I come with love and respect. acting pissed off and frustrated is how i express myself
|
|
|
Post by nicholas on Dec 6, 2011 2:45:33 GMT -5
probably both. don't worry, I come with love and respect. acting pissed off and frustrated is how i express myself Nice. Well thank you, kind asshole. lololol. xD
|
|
|
Post by lagger21 on Dec 17, 2011 17:28:05 GMT -5
i think nicholas is just wording everything wrong. what he wants is for lagwagon to give him an mp3 of may 16 without vocals. he doesnt want to do with some shitty software, or have talented musicians on this board make it for him, he just wants the real deal studio version without vocals. im sure he doesnt actually mean he wants lagwagon to physically hand over the master copy of the song, because that would just be stupid of him to think it would be possible. maybe if he didnt name the thread 'lagwagon multi-tracks' and constantly mention the term multi tracks like some recording noob, we'd understand what he was talking about nicholas you noob lmao
|
|